vatcheckapi alternative: Veriport and vatcheckapi compared on price, evidence and VIES outages
vatcheckapi is the price leader among the subscription APIs, operated from Austria and Germany; this page is for the developer who needs the same VIES validation at a lower or irregular volume, wants prepaid calls instead of a subscription, or wants the degraded path (dated cached answers when a member state is down) explicit in the response. vatcheckapi’s entry paid plan is Small $9.99/mo, 2,000 validations; Veriport starts at 100 free calls a month, then $9 for 2,000 prepaid calls. Prices as published on 2026-10-28; check the vendor’s page before deciding.
- vatcheckapi: Small $9.99/mo, 2,000 validations; $5.00 (Small) → $3.60 (Medium $35.99, 10,000) → $2.40 (Large $95.99, 40,000) per 1,000; free tier: 150 validations a month, 10 requests a minute, no card.
- vatcheckapi when VIES is down: A 503 when a register is down; 5xx not counted; no cache stated. Data residency: Servers in Germany (Everapi GmbH, Austria).
- Veriport: 100 calls a month with a key, 20 a day without, no card, no expiry; $4.50 (2,000 pack) → $3.00 (plan) → $2.90 (10,000 pack); tax included; Yes:
requester→consultationNumberon the paid tiers, live answers only. - Veriport when VIES is down: The answer of the last 30 days, dated and marked
stale; else a 503 that is not counted; a public per-member-state record. Functions and database in Paris, France (EU); publisher in the US.
Price per 1,000 validations
Prices are what each vendor’s public page said on 2026-10-28 (linked in the sources); they exclude VAT where the vendor says so, and Veriport’s include it. Per-1,000 figures assume full use of the included volume. Nothing here is benchmarked: uptime, latency and support are not measured by us.
| Offer | Price | Included | Per 1,000 | Billing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vatcheckapi Free | $0 | 150 validations, 10 requests/min | — | No card |
| vatcheckapi Small | $9.99 / month | 2,000 validations | $5.00 | Subscription (annual: two months free) |
| vatcheckapi Medium | $35.99 / month | 10,000 validations, sandbox keys | $3.60 | Subscription |
| vatcheckapi Large | $95.99 / month | 40,000 validations | $2.40 | Subscription |
| Veriport free tier | $0 | 100 calls a month, 20 a day without a key | — | No card |
| Veriport 2,000 pack | $9 once | 2,000 calls, 12 months | $4.50 | Prepaid, no renewal |
| Veriport 10,000 pack | $29 once | 10,000 calls, 12 months | $2.90 | Prepaid, no renewal |
| Veriport monthly plan | $15 / month | 5,000 calls + bulk | $3.00 | Subscription, cancel any time |
What is different, honestly
vatcheckapi has more: a larger free tier (150 a month), GB numbers through a commercial data service, sandbox keys on Medium and above, servers in Germany, and the lowest subscription price per 1,000 above 40,000 checks a month. Veriport has less, on purpose: deterministic endpoints, an OpenAPI document, prepaid calls that do not renew, and a response that states its own provenance (live, cache with stale, structure_only) so your code decides. The VAT rates table, the IBAN check and the French company registry come in the same call budget, which matters to a billing system that needs all of them. What neither can do: make VIES available. When a member state is down, vatcheckapi’s page says: a 503 when a register is down; 5xx not counted; no cache stated. Veriport serves the answer it obtained for the same number in the last 30 days, dated and marked stale, never attaches a consultation number it did not obtain live, and publishes the per-member-state record.
Consultation numbers and evidence
vatcheckapi: yes: requester_vat_number → consultation number (docs; sandbox returns a fixed one). Veriport: pass your own VAT number as requester on a prepaid pack or the plan and the live answer carries consultationNumber, the reference tax administrations ask for; every answer carries requestDate, source.kind and source.checkedAt, so a stored row says what was checked, when, and against what.
When to pick which
Pick vatcheckapi when you want the cheapest subscription at 10,000 to 40,000 checks a month, a sandbox for your test suite, or a European operator with servers in Germany on the invoice. Pick Veriport when you want to pay for what you use (a few hundred validations a quarter is the common case for a small SaaS), need rates, IBAN and French company data in the same call budget, or want the degraded path explicit and documented. The roundup puts Vatstack, vatlayer (apilayer), Abstract API, VATSense, VIES API (viesapi.eu), Stripe Tax in the same table.
Questions
- Is migrating from vatcheckapi hard?
- The response shapes differ; the fields you use (valid, name, address, the consultation number where the vendor returns one) exist in both. Budget an hour for a small integration. Keep your history: consultation numbers are evidence regardless of who obtained them.
- Where do these prices come from?
- vatcheckapi’s public page on 2026-10-28, linked in the sources below, and our own price table. We do not resell or benchmark their uptime; the VIES availability we publish is the Commission’s own status, measured by us.
- Which is cheaper?
- Below 100 checks a month, both are free. Between a few hundred and 2,000 a month, a prepaid pack is cheaper than any subscription that renews whether you use it or not. Above 10,000 a month every month, compare vatcheckapi’s larger tiers with the monthly plan; the roundup has the figures.
Free tier now; packs and plan when checkout opens.
See the pricingSources
- vatcheckapi pricing (Everapi GmbH): Free 150 validations/month (10 requests/min), Small $9.99 (2,000), Medium $35.99 (10,000), Large $95.99 (40,000), annual = two months free; prices exclude VAT; servers in Germany; sandbox keys on Medium and above; requester_vat_number → consultation number (docs); 5xx not counted — Everapi GmbH (vatcheckapi), consulted 2026-10-28
- VIES REST API — check-vat-number, check-status (technical information) — European Commission, DG TAXUD, consulted 2026-10-24
- VIES — help page: what the consultation number proves, member-state availability — European Commission, DG TAXUD, consulted 2026-10-24